30
Jan
2024

US pause on LNG projects adds new dimension to negotiations with buyers

The Biden administration’s pause on LNG exports to non-FTA countries has introduced fundamental uncertainty to the country’s gas sector. 

Couched in a review of current approval methodology by the Department of Energy (DoE), the move would overall aim to draw in wider implications, including the potential impact on the cost of energy for American consumers and manufacturers, or the climate impact of associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. 

Most immediately, four projects with DoE applications for export stand to be impacted: Commonwealth LNG (9.3 mtpa capacity), Port Arthur LNG Trains 3 and 4 (13.5 mtpa), Lake Charles LNG (17.8 mtpa) and Magnolia LNG (8.8 mtpa). Others, like Venture Global’s Calcasieu Pass 2 (CP2) project, will also find themselves in the same situation if and when they obtain FERC approval and apply for DoE approval. 

However, the consequences — of an extended pause or a substantially tightened DoE approval process — could be much wider. 

Currently, 18 projects have received DoE approval for the export of approximately 240 mtpa to non-FTA countries. Each approval stipulates that first exports must take place before a specified date. Assuming a construction period of four years, roughly 110 mtpa of capacity may have difficulty complying with this requirement and would therefore need to apply for an extension. This includes plants like Mexico Pacific, and the likes of Delfin LNG, which have not yet taken FID. 

Three red flags 

This already points to three uncertainties arising from the recent announcement: how long the pause to approvals will be, how the application review methodology will change and whether it will be applied to requests for approval extensions rather than new requests only. 

The US government’s original notice on the pause was brief and without any further clarity around the criteria relating to new methodology or indication for when a new regime would be in place. 

Unsurprisingly, there are now more questions. The US noted it “remains unwavering” in its commitment to supporting its allies. It reiterates its ability to supply LNG to Europe through existing LNG production infrastructure but does not confirm that additional capacity will be approved if it contributes to Europe’s security of supply. It does not confirm how a test of contribution to security of supply would be applied. 

And, given the DoE’s review to address inclusion of climate impacts, there is no confirmation that the role of gas in helping countries reduce coal consumption will be taken into account. 

This pause is just that: a temporary pause. It may come to very little and will most likely come to nothing if the Republican candidate wins the next presidential election. 

Costs, funding snags   

However, it adds to mounting pressure on the US LNG industry and is causing more consternation than it otherwise would do. US LNG project developers face a triple whammy of rising materials and labour costs, buyers with low price expectations, and rising financing costs amplified by the increasing reluctance of lenders to finance fossil-fuel projects. 

Project developers are aware that they have a limited time window in which to get their projects to market before global demand begins to wane, and politically motivated delays do not help. 

Timing impacts 

Beyond this, the implications for LNG projects and their customers will likely be project specific. 

Many have locked-in EPC contractors on the wrong side of inflation, and contractors with sunset clauses will likely consider reopening their contracts, potentially with knock-on consequences for offtakers. 

Offtakers themselves might look for ways to exit or renegotiate their SPAs if their market views turn more bearish in the interim. For instance, TotalEnergies had to halt development of its Mozambique LNG project in 2021 for security reasons; subsequently, Indonesia’s Pertamina cancelled a 1 mtpa, 20-year offtake agreement, although it did not publicly confirm its reason. Customers of US projects may now be thinking the same thing. 

Projects lacking a well-funded investor may struggle to sustain themselves during this period of uncertainty. Private equity backers may reconsider the economic rationale of continued investment relative to the other sectors in which they operate. 

Buyers currently negotiating for long-term LNG supply will need to take these factors into account when deciding which potential suppliers to focus on. 

Sourcing LNG amid moratorium 

Gas Strategies estimates that the global LNG market will grow another 400 to 550 mtpa on top of the 435 mtpa exported in 2023, peaking around 2040. A further 80 to 90 mtpa will be required to replace LNG production declines in existing plants. Of this total, approximately half would come from the US. Given that 82 mtpa is currently under-construction in the USA (and assuming that this capacity will not be unapproved by the DoE), this implies another 160 to 225 mtpa of capacity from US projects that have DoE approval but have not taken FID or are still to be approved. 

If a substantial amount of this capacity is not approved, it is not clear where buyers will be able to source the LNG they need. Qatar has a lot of uncontracted capacity under development, but this is largely already accounted for in the 50% of LNG production capacity growth from non-US projects. Projects in East Africa and Russia are facing their own challenges are will not likely be able to make up a large shortfall. We could instead see higher LNG spot prices in the early 2030s and a sooner-than-expected plateau in LNG production. 

LNG buyers currently in the market for LNG may now have to add another dimension to their negotiations. If and when the DoE introduces a revised assessment methodology, buyers will need to consider how likely it is that their presumptive counterparty will obtain DoE approval. That approval may even hinge on what the buyer brings, in terms of an energy security or energy transition narrative. 

Given that the Biden administration’s move is an attempt to push this issue beyond the next election, it is likely to be several more months before we get a definitive answer to these questions. 

 

Get in touch today to find out more about how Gas Strategies can support your organisation with any of the points in this blog or regarding any aspect of the energy transition. Contact us

Latest Blogs

09
Jan
2024
US LNG tanker sailing

US LNG takes the crown. What next?

In less than a decade, the US has risen to be the largest LNG exporter in the world – and its dominance is only set to continue. But what could the implications of this be for global gas markets? And are there geopolitical risks to be found in dependence on one exporter for the lion’s share of future new supply?  

21
Dec
2023

COP 28 – a good outcome for the gas industry

Gas Strategies discusses the implications of the COP 28 climate summit on the gas industry

05
Dec
2023
hydrogen pic icons

Can Blue Hydrogen burst Green Hydrogen’s bubble?

Managing Consultant David Drury, recently participated in a hydrogen panel session at the 2023 World LNG Summit in Athens. The following blog is based on David’s opening remarks. 

30
Nov
2023
Flaring image with EU flag and blue sky

EU Methane Regulations: Here’s what you need to know 

Ahead of COP28, EU policy makers reached a preliminary agreement on the bloc’s EU Methane Regulation, which aims to reduce methane emissions in the EU’s energy sector and its global supply chains. This blog highlights key considerations for those in the global Oil & Gas industry on the EU’s proposed new rules.

10
Nov
2023
Hand touching hydrogen H2 gas molecule

Adjusting our mindset: Why industrial customers will lead the hydrogen revolution

The growth of Hydrogen will be underpinned by industrial customers with clear business cases working collaboratively with suppliers to manage risk. However, the nascent business has much to learn from similarly overhyped sectors in the past.

05
Jul
2023

Filling the void: Are African independents positioned to win as IOCs offload assets?

Mid-tier indigenous firms stand to gain the most from the IOCs ‘reshuffling’ their African assets, thanks to their deep local knowledge and government relationships, but there are hurdles to overcome in sourcing investment and securing the most commercially viable deal. 

Did you know that your Internet Explorer Browser is out of date?

Your MS Internet Explorer browser is out of date, and will not be fully compatible with our website. For best browsing experience we recommend that you upgrade your IE browser to a more recent version or use an alternative, more recent browser.